Too central to fail?

Financial regulators and policy makers should focus on financial institutions that are ‘too central to fail’ as well as those that are ‘too big to fail’, research published in Scientific Reports this week suggests. The quantitative analysis of emergency loans made by the US Federal Reserve Bank during the financial crisis highlights the importance of an institution’s position within a financial network.
Systemic risk — the risk of default of a large portion of a financial system — depends on the network of financial exposures among institutions, but there is no widely accepted method for working out which institutions in a network are the most important to the stability of the system. Inspired by feedback-centrality measures in networks, such as PageRank, Stefano Battiston and colleagues introduce a new measure of systemic impact, which they call DebtRank. They use DebtRank to analyze a recently released data set with information on the institutions that received aid from the US Federal Reserve Bank through its US$1.2 trillion emergency loans programmes from 2008 to 2010.
The authors find that during the peak of the crisis, a group of 22 financial institutions, which received most of the loans, became more central to the network, which means that the default of each one would have a larger economic impact on the whole network. Even small, dispersed shocks to individual banks could thus have triggered the default of a large portion of the system. The authors note that because the network of impact used in the study is a proxy of the real, unknown network, the findings should be regarded with caution, but the study shows the kinds of insights that can be gained using DebtRank.
(source: Nature)
Stefano Battiston (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

The DebtRank network of the top borrowers during the peak of the crisis. Nodes represent financial institutions among the most exposed to the FED. The outgoing links account fo the network effects where the potential impact of an institution to another one is computed with the DebtRank. In the diagram, if the position of a node is more central, the relative impact on the financial system, in case of default or financial distress, is larger. The colors of the nodes show the distress level, their sizes the debt with the FED.
Credit: Stefano Battiston


One response to “Too central to fail?

  1. Hey there! I just would like to give you a big thumbs up
    for the great info you’ve got here on this post. I am coming back to your site for more soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s